He did mention though that the guy who did the suggestion is an S in KLEMS. If the man was a consultant and was paid for it, it will show up as an S in the equation and would show no increase in the multifactor productivity output. On the other hand, if the idea was from a bright worker and was not paid, then there is no input recorded. If you are one of these people who would rather do things on his or her own, then now is the time to realize how big self-assessment can contribute to your being productive. Experts say that if one starts with the process of self-assessment now, it will be easier for him or her to be productive and \accomplish greater things for themselves and for the people that they love in the future. To make it so, make it easily comparable to several set of activities or to other simpler and achieved goals. By that, the progress and development of your efforts to achieve the goals would be measurable and comparable. Of course, being realistic is part of the game. You would not set goals that are too impossible to achieve, right? Productivity measures of knowledge work are more loosely structured and less accurate than the measures of other types of work. People are always reluctant to accept anything less structured and less accurate. Suggested solutions In the past, knowledge work has been exempted from productivity evaluations because of complexity. Both technological and market elements (output quantities and prices, respectively) interact with one another to determine economic productivity. Calculations One gets the average economic productivity by dividing output value and (time or physical) units of input. In addition, if the production process uses only one factor (labor, for example), the procedure gives the productivity name of that factor. Bernard (1986) used project teams and stressed maximizing diversity with the premise that managers cannot be assumed to know what really is going on. Thor (1990) also dealt with group techniques. These include a participatory style, with each group having a facilitator who should be familiar with the technique but at the same time relatively unknown to the group.